Archive for the ‘Chibi no Nothing’ Category

Poll Results: “How do you ‘feel’ anime?”

Tuesday, September 4th, 2007

The following post first appeared on my old blog: Chibi no Nothing

When I created the poll I was thinking about “feel” in terms of the answer choices. I felt that in context it made sense. I think most respondents understood what I was asking. These things are supposed to be fun and interesting. Let’s examine the results.
Stats: “How do you ‘feel’ anime?”
Voter turnout 2.6 %
(37%) With my heart
(18%) With my head
(27%) With my soul
(13%) In my pants
(2%)  What’s anime?

I had actually thought that I would have a few more “in my pants” votes. We all understand what the implication was here. If one were to investigate this further then the interesting aspect here would be where those leanings fall in the rage from moe to hardcore hentai. Because anime has such as wide range of genre there is literally a perversion to fit anyone’s fancy.

Honestly, I think these were a few jokers who voted for the option because it was funny. That’s alright, because it was supposed to be funny. We know anime fans are not as single minded as this particular answer would imply they should be. People are simply not driven entirely by a single force in all their actions. That is to say, people do things that contradict the “base instinct” arguments. One of those things would be sitting at home and watching anime; or, they could, perhaps, spending time writing a blog about anime.

Of the choices “heart” and “soul” are probably the hardest to differentiate. Some may say they are one in the same. I wanted to separate them. When using the “heart” it implies a fondness that is natural or even passive. When using the “soul” it implies that there is a type of integration. The individual identifies their self with the subject. Of the answers provided I think these two were probably answered the most honestly.

It could be said that these two may have an addictive quality mixed into them. Many of us would describe our viewing habits as a “hobby.” In that regard it is plainly a distraction from whatever it is that consumes the other parts of our days whether it is family, friends, work, school, or any other matters. However, all things that bring pleasure also run the risk of addiction. Many feel that addiction is an expression of chemical dependence. It is possible to become psychologically addicted to something as well. In that vein, I would have to say that escapism is the actual addiction. Sometimes we need to get away from everything, and some of us don’t necessarily see a reason to come back.

Finally, there is a strong subset of anime viewers who tend to analyze and pour over the subject matter. They think and re-think aspects that many others don’t seem to care about. We probably get much of our fan-based terminology from these people. Those who indulge with their “head” are a unique bunch indeed. One wonders if these people subject the rest of their dealings to the same analytical rigor.

There isn’t anything strictly wrong with those who think, not any more so than the other options provided in the poll. For that matter, can we really divide the fan base into these groups? Does it make sense? I find it hard to believe that one can be individually categorized into any one grouping given here. What of those that simply do not fit into one of the options provided? Do we simply pigeon-hole them into a space. The problem with the options are that the voters were forced to pick between the options, there were no other choices. In my opinion the anime viewer is made up of a finer grain.

At any rate, I was fairly sure “heart” was going to win out in the end, heart always wins in the end

Question: Are we all just really simple?

Wednesday, August 22nd, 2007

The following post first appeared on my old blog: Chibi no Nothing

“I simply liked this character. She was fun straight forward and easy to grasp.”
about Makoto of The Girl Who Leapt Through Time

“Still, Noda is the character that I liked. She was simple. There wasn’t any pretense with her.”
about Noda of Nodame Cantabile

It occurred to me shortly after posting my thoughts on The Girl Who Leapt Through Time that there was a somewhat consistent theme when it came to characters that I liked. I seem to prefer “simple” characters.

It is not that I only like characters that are not “deep.” There are many characters that I have found intriguing that could not be described as simple. For instance, Misaki from Welcome to NHK incited a wealth of emotions, in particular empathy. Hagu, of Honey & Clover, would seem to be an underdeveloped character but for the intricacies of her motivations.

One of the reasons that so many anime archetypes are rehashed repeatedly is because we know what to expect from the character when they are presented for the first time. The character’s actions and responses lead us into forming a first impression; if that character type has been exhaustively defined in other genre and stories then we know what to expect from that character. This initial impression is better as a marketing device that attracts viewers than it is in progression of the story and development of the characters.

That initial impression is only a starting point. Usually, the characters will evolve throughout the story. They may reach a final point to their development, and usually that is around the end of the story or that character’s part in that story. It isn’t unusual because when one examines the typical story, once the characters have no more to learn then there is less left for us to experience.

Notice that I attribute qualities to these characters based on personal perception. That is the key for me when introduced to new characters within a story. I make a conscience effort to relate to characters when possible, but that isn’t always possible. Not every character lends itself to self introspection. Oddly, when a character can be described as “simple” we get chances to evaluate ourselves that do not necessarily appear with characters whose motivations are more elaborately defined. Arguably, many anime characters are not very complex, but that hasn’t seemed to limit their impact on the story.

When we speak of character development we unusually mean it in the form of behavioral and emotional attributes. This is the necessary information we need to understand and guess about how the character would react given a situation or event. When a character lacks these qualities, what are we to do? No matter what, we will use our own personality and experiences to enhance the story and characters. This specific quality of people is unavoidable. In those instances that we are presented less substance to work with in personally developing a profile for a character, we use ourselves as a model. In order to understand others we have to at least be able to imagine “walking in their shoes.”

Empathy is probably the best example of this type of behavior in people. If someone cannot imagine the circumstances of another person then empathy is simply impossible. One can extend that simple observation whether it be love, hate, anger, sadness, happiness, sorrow, or any other emotions.

That is what a story is anyway, isn’t it? It’s a blending of emotions. They are words meant to incite feeling. I keep saying that emotion is the universal language simply because we can all understand these feelings instinctively. To the degree and complexity that we can experience something like empathy for the events in a story is due solely to the extent that we have experienced being human.

It really is that simple.

-

BTW, Ayanami Rei > Asuka . . . I’ll just say it, Rei > *

Toki wo Kakeru Shoujo – Time wouldn’t be so much a predator, if you could leap from time to time.

Monday, August 13th, 2007

The following post first appeared on my old blog: Chibi no Nothing

I had been planning to watch Toki wo Kakeru Shoujo (The Girl Who Leapt Through Time) for a couple of weeks. To be honest it was the name of the movie alone that drew me to it. I watched the first few minutes of it a week ago, but I was caught up in some other activity that I do not recall, which made me put off watching the show for a while. I finally got around to sitting down for roughly ninety minutes in order to watch the movie.

I don’t watch many feature length anime. This has to do with both availability and time. It is a lot easier to sit for twenty or thirty minutes indulging in a little procrastination while not feeling too bad for the experience than it is to sit for ninety.

For that matter, there is only one reason that I actually managed to watch the entire show. I have plenty of things that I should be doing, given that school is about to start again soon. However, the movie starts out showing the main character Makoto who is plainly a fun character in general.

I’m not too concerned with the technical merits of the voice acting. I’m not speaking for the character design either, which seem to be rather ordinary. The animation quality was impressive. That did not sway my opinion very much as I have come to expect better quality in feature length anime. I simply liked this character. She was fun straight forward and easy to grasp. Those are not necessarily adjectives that I would generally give as positive attributes. In the context of the story it was exactly what was needed. She gains an incredible power that allows her to leap through time, and she uses it to achieve relatively mundane tasks.

Watching her realize that she had the power to fly back in time then seeing what she did with it was done perfectly as far as animation and story telling go. We could see her mind working as she comprehended the situation. We could also see how she totally missed the incredible depth and vast potential she had at her disposal.

What I liked the most was exactly that she did not use her time leaping ability to save the world or change the destiny of all man kind. Her outlook was entirely superficial at first. At its peak it only extended to her friends at school. She was in ever sense of the word a “kid” about the whole thing.

The movie had its less light moments. They worked in a little drama and romance toward the end of the movie. The message, “time waits for no one” seemed to be appropriate. Throughout the movie Makoto tried to change aspects of event to get a desired goal. There just was no way for her to create the perfect history. It would seem fate was the real message.

I would have really liked to take this post on some type of emotional diatribe about how time can both heal and cause great distress. It just doesn’t jive with the movie. I simply wasn’t too moved by it. Please do not misunderstand me on that last comment I thoroughly enjoyed watching it.

My one thought while watching Toki wo Kakeru Shoujo wasn’t about time travel or changing fate. I couldn’t seem to shake the thought that I would really like to see a show based on Makoto just being Makoto all day and nothing more.

Toki+wo+Kakeru+Shoujo+(The+Girl+Who+Leapt+Through+Time)+-+Mokoto

-

About the person in the lab room: I think it was Makoto who was in the lab and pushed herself.

Also, I’m trying out bloggers new polling widget. Please vote, if it isn’t too much trouble. It’s on the right side near the top.

Op Ed – Gwad, it’s another post about anime fans and the lack of depth in anime/fans. . .wait no it isn’t

Sunday, August 5th, 2007

The following post first appeared on my old blog: Chibi no Nothing

For the past week or so there have been many blogs of various blog stature posting about a general topic. The topic is basically why anime fans are the way they are. There have been sprinkles of self-hatred mixed with a healthy dose of egotism. However, the general view is that anime is fairly childish and you (we) are odd because we like it. Yet, we can all deal with it because it’s just so darn entertaining.

I was just going to let it all sink in and file it away, but I came across End of the World’s [Group discussion] The follow-up, which was a follow-up to [Group discussion] “Anime isn’t deep. It’s just entertainment.”.

Apparently, according to EoW, these guys got together and decided to post this stuff around the same time. Naturally, I’m feeling left out.

To sum my feelings about the whole thing. Here is a post I made at the beginning of the year that is related.

Jan 10 ’07: On Perspective and Interpretation (made with ~65% mushed up soul ball)

The short version is that art is only a medium for expression. Its “depth” cannot be measured within its own merit. You as the one who experiences the art inevitably add to that work. You are part of it. This shows in the great divergence of opinions when it comes to the “depth” of something. However, “depth” is only one metric that we can use to judge art.

These posts (many linked from the EoW article) talk about other aspects, but I just wanted to hit on that one. It should be understood that what may move an individual of one nature may not phase another of a different nature.

RE: Nadesico-type note to self: Get to burning

Saturday, August 4th, 2007

The following post first appeared on my old blog: Chibi no Nothing

Dear Karmaburn,

After reading your latest post on Martian Successor Nadesico I am inclined to agree that scene is indeed “crazy.” However, I fear that you may have overlooked the additionally cool few frames of the OP, which show Ruri’s technicolor computer interface.

Nadesico+-+Ruri+crazy+hand+thing

It’s one thing to have glowing eyes, but operating a high mobile battleship with an interface that is equivalent to a bad acid trip is friggin’ awesome.

So, in conclusion, while I respect your opinion about the “crazy shit” with Ruri’s eyes I am forced to disagree with you on this issue.

Yours truly,

j.valdez