<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosario + Vampire = Boobies + Panties . . . apparently.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/</link>
	<description>nowhere near somewhere . . .</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 14:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: trifaxbax</title>
		<link>http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-7258</link>
		<dc:creator>trifaxbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/#comment-7258</guid>
		<description>emm.. love it ))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>emm.. love it ))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.valdez</title>
		<link>http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>j.valdez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>@CCY - Personally, I thought the &quot;2 * boob&quot; joke was hilarious. Math jokes can be funny, no? 

You wouldn&#039;t be the first anime fan to give panties more than cursory examination; so, don&#039;t worry about it.

@IKnight - Nope, I&#039;m no linguist. 

Over here (in my immediate area) we tend to use pants as a general term, but one could say jeans, slacks, or call them by the company names such as dockers or Levi&#039;s depending on the item in question. The word &quot;trousers&quot; is simply not used to describe these articles of clothing. 

As far as for having to read my post multiple times, I&#039;m assuming it became more interesting and entertaining with each read =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@CCY &#8211; Personally, I thought the &#8220;2 * boob&#8221; joke was hilarious. Math jokes can be funny, no? </p>
<p>You wouldn&#8217;t be the first anime fan to give panties more than cursory examination; so, don&#8217;t worry about it.</p>
<p>@IKnight &#8211; Nope, I&#8217;m no linguist. </p>
<p>Over here (in my immediate area) we tend to use pants as a general term, but one could say jeans, slacks, or call them by the company names such as dockers or Levi&#8217;s depending on the item in question. The word &#8220;trousers&#8221; is simply not used to describe these articles of clothing. </p>
<p>As far as for having to read my post multiple times, I&#8217;m assuming it became more interesting and entertaining with each read =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IKnight</title>
		<link>http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>IKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>&#039;panties&#039; seems to have originated as a derogatory term for &lt;em&gt;boys&#039;&lt;/em&gt; short trousers (earliest OED reference is &#039;If your panties weren&#039;t sheeted home at the bottom, you&#039;d out-jump a monkey&#039;, 1845). The earliest found written use of the word to refer to female undergarments is actually as late as 1908. But if you&#039;re a linguist you may know more about this than I.

Maths is not my strong point, and where I live, &#039;pants&#039; aren&#039;t trousers, so I had to read this post several times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;panties&#8217; seems to have originated as a derogatory term for <em>boys&#8217;</em> short trousers (earliest OED reference is &#8216;If your panties weren&#8217;t sheeted home at the bottom, you&#8217;d out-jump a monkey&#8217;, 1845). The earliest found written use of the word to refer to female undergarments is actually as late as 1908. But if you&#8217;re a linguist you may know more about this than I.</p>
<p>Maths is not my strong point, and where I live, &#8216;pants&#8217; aren&#8217;t trousers, so I had to read this post several times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCY</title>
		<link>http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>CCY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farawaynowhere.com/blog/2008/01/18/rosario-vampire-boobies-panties-apparently/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>This kind of stuff is especially funny after a calculus final. Just got to find the area under those curves... 

And I&#039;m tempted to say that it&#039;s called &#039;panties&#039; because the &#039;-ies&#039; adds a more delicate sound to it (kind of like &#039;cutie&#039; or something, I suppose).

Just gotta tell myself it&#039;s linguistic analysis, I&#039;m not a dirty old man (and by old I mean young), no, no siree. XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of stuff is especially funny after a calculus final. Just got to find the area under those curves&#8230; </p>
<p>And I&#8217;m tempted to say that it&#8217;s called &#8216;panties&#8217; because the &#8216;-ies&#8217; adds a more delicate sound to it (kind of like &#8216;cutie&#8217; or something, I suppose).</p>
<p>Just gotta tell myself it&#8217;s linguistic analysis, I&#8217;m not a dirty old man (and by old I mean young), no, no siree. XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
