Archive for January, 2008

Situation abnormal…but that’s normal

Thursday, January 31st, 2008

I had missed the last few posts over at Karmaburn due to being busy. For Evirus to have three posts in two days is end-of-the-world type stuff. I had to check CNN to see if we weren’t under some type of Cloverfield attack. The good news is that there isn’t a giant Godzilla type monster attacking New York; however, the bad news is that things aren’t exactly peachy either.

It appears Karmaburn and アニ・ノート decided to implement a plugin that allows for them to order their categories from oldest to newest. This is all well and good, but what about we that utilize tags?

<?php
/*
Plugin Name: tag asc
Description: Set tag order to ascending
Author: author
Version: 0.1
*/
add_action('pre_get_posts', 'order_set_ascending' );
function order_set_ascending( $notused ) {
	if( is_tag() ) {
		set_query_var('order', "ASC");
	}
}
?>

I used my l33t skills to edit the plugin to do tag ordering instead of the categories.  I’ve emphasized the relevant code.

-

As long as we’re on Cloverfield, that movie almost made by barf. I couldn’t make it through the entire thing. It appears I have what some have discribed as CBS (Cloverfield Barf Syndrome).

Rosario + Vampire = Boobies + Panties . . . apparently.

Friday, January 18th, 2008

Unfortunately, we cannot determine whether vampire equals boobies or panties. I tried doing some factoring, but only got as far as “rosario + vampire = 2 * boob + panties,” which was none too enlightening. One must be careful to realize that panties is one of those variables that seems to be plural when, in fact, it can be singular. We don’t know if that should be more than one “panties.”

Ostensibly, we are compelled to assume panties is greater than 1. After all, it would be a little disturbing if it were only a single pair.

New equation:

vampire = 2 * boob + n * panties - rosario
where n = [0, infinity)

What does this mean? Absolutely nothing.

Also, why is it called a pair of panties? I know it’s an old question, but I haven’t ever received a satisfactory answer to it. It’s not like pants. Pants have two legs that lend themselves to being called a pair. As far as I can tell panties are composed of a single unit.

I think what we have here is what linguists would call “semantic change.” Doesn’t it seem like the meanings of “pant” and “panties” are switched? I think a very long time ago some guy/girl with dyslexia kept getting the words mixed up and others simply stopped correcting the mistake because it was tiring. They probably just took what they were saying in context. Over time people started to use the same meanings for those two words.

Yeah, that’s the way it happened…

more OCD…

Extra credit:

  • Blood+ = ?
  • infinite Ryvius = ?
  • 3×3 eyes = ?
  • Samurai X = ?

These are the only ones I could think of at the moment. BTW, the 3×3 eyes OVA’s are pretty good.

Hayate no Gotoku! - for those of you who like this kind of stuff

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

hayate-no-gotoku-getting-into-it.png

The last episode of the season was the best yet. They went all out with this one. It’s pure Hayate no Gotoku~ishness straight through to the end.

An OCD thing:

Every time I see one of those still image pans in an anime I have an urge to put it back together. At any rate, I put these two images back together after watching the show. Keep in mind that the quality of the image is only as good as the source, which wasn’t too bad.


hayate-no-gotoku-hayate-moe-1.png

hayate-no-gotoku-hayate-moe-2.png

Click on the images for the larger version.

Hayate no Gotoku! - for a bit of introspection

Monday, January 7th, 2008

Episode 37 finds Nagi discovering that Hayate prefers “normal” girls. In a bold move to be more appealing to her combat butler Nagi ventures off to discover how to master being normal.

Hilarity ensues.

hayate-no-gotoku-stop-bragging-about-being-normal.png

Yeah, normal people, why do you always have to flaunt your normalcy? You and your, “Ohh, look at me. I’m so normal. Neh-neh-neh.”

I’ve written about being normal before. Although, overall that post was mostly a commentary on otaku collection habits.

To quote myself:

It is the relativity of the social construct that is normalcy that makes using it as a measure of worth a double-edged sword. These ideas have lead to disputes among social groups, friends, family, neighbors, religions, nations, and pretty much every division humanity has placed unto itself. Our disputes, many times, are grounded in divergent ideals. Your normal is not someone else’s normal.

Everyone has to stop and wonder about their place in the world, if only for a scant few seconds. For many it is a simple thought game, but for others it defines their beings. Some of us may question our goals and the path that we have taken. Where am I going? What will I do when I get there? These are questions raised without answers given most of the time.

I’m not one to say that everyone is the same because there are major differences between peoples. The fact still remains that one cannot deny people are largely more alike than they are different. We may have differing cultural identities, but we are all the same species. That alone makes all of us more similar than different.

That is unless one where to take themselves as some type of evolutionary disparity. This would more likely make you insane that evolved. Oddly, that would make you different or not normal from the perspective of the sane. Yet, you would be complete normal with regard to the insane.

Humans exist within a world of dualities. We are alike and different at the same time. It’s all a matter of perspective. As a matter of worth it seems that most people tend to aim for their idea of normal rather than super-normal or some exceedingly grand ideal.

So, next time some one implies that you are “normal,” just say damn-straight!

-

edit: oops, misspelled “introspection” in the title originally. Although, you have to admit that “instrospection” sounds like a pretty cool word.